<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three Great Ideas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benisntfunny.com/2010/01/25/three-great-ideas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benisntfunny.com/2010/01/25/three-great-ideas/</link>
	<description>I&#039;m Perfect</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:31:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simona</title>
		<link>http://benisntfunny.com/2010/01/25/three-great-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Simona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benisntfunny.com/?p=146#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Cannot but agree. Three great ideas! However, I think the KRT doesn’t touch the seed of the corn problem, the latter not only being unhealthy, but also causing more global warming. Genetically produced corn is mostly used to feed the cattle, while the latter&#039;s production emits a lot of greenhouse gas. Another path to a long-term solution should therefore also be converting corn fields into permanent pastures, where then grazing the cattle and at the same time help keeping CO2 in the ground. That, of course, doesn’t diminish the impact of your green corn idea. I just believe that its long term solution should start at its production, the latter having a huge further spill over effect. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cannot but agree. Three great ideas! However, I think the KRT doesn’t touch the seed of the corn problem, the latter not only being unhealthy, but also causing more global warming. Genetically produced corn is mostly used to feed the cattle, while the latter&#039;s production emits a lot of greenhouse gas. Another path to a long-term solution should therefore also be converting corn fields into permanent pastures, where then grazing the cattle and at the same time help keeping CO2 in the ground. That, of course, doesn’t diminish the impact of your green corn idea. I just believe that its long term solution should start at its production, the latter having a huge further spill over effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simona</title>
		<link>http://benisntfunny.com/2010/01/25/three-great-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Simona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benisntfunny.com/?p=146#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Cannot but agree. Three great ideas! However, I think the KRT doesn’t touch the seed of the corn problem, the latter not only being unhealthy, but also causing more global warming. Genetically produced corn is mostly used to feed the cattle, while the latter&#039;s production emits a lot of greenhouse gas. Another path to a long-term solution should therefore also be converting corn fields into permanent pastures, where then grazing the cattle and at the same time help keeping CO2 in the ground. That, of course, doesn’t diminish the impact of your green corn idea. I just believe that its long term solution should start at its production, the latter having a huge further spill over ef</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cannot but agree. Three great ideas! However, I think the KRT doesn’t touch the seed of the corn problem, the latter not only being unhealthy, but also causing more global warming. Genetically produced corn is mostly used to feed the cattle, while the latter&#039;s production emits a lot of greenhouse gas. Another path to a long-term solution should therefore also be converting corn fields into permanent pastures, where then grazing the cattle and at the same time help keeping CO2 in the ground. That, of course, doesn’t diminish the impact of your green corn idea. I just believe that its long term solution should start at its production, the latter having a huge further spill over ef</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

